Comprehensive comparative analysis of 5'-end RNA-sequencing methods.

Nat Methods
Authors
Keywords
Abstract

Specialized RNA-seq methods are required to identify the 5' ends of transcripts, which are critical for studies of gene regulation, but these methods have not been systematically benchmarked. We directly compared six such methods, including the performance of five methods on a single human cellular RNA sample and a new spike-in RNA assay that helps circumvent challenges resulting from uncertainties in annotation and RNA processing. We found that the 'cap analysis of gene expression' (CAGE) method performed best for mRNA and that most of its unannotated peaks were supported by evidence from other genomic methods. We applied CAGE to eight brain-related samples and determined sample-specific transcription start site (TSS) usage, as well as a transcriptome-wide shift in TSS usage between fetal and adult brain.

Year of Publication
2018
Journal
Nat Methods
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
505-511
Date Published
2018 07
ISSN
1548-7105
DOI
10.1038/s41592-018-0014-2
PubMed ID
29867192
PubMed Central ID
PMC6075671
Links
Grant list
U24 CA180922 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
MC_UP_1201/9 / MRC_ / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom
R00 CA207865 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U01 MH105960 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
K99 CA207865 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R01 MH115045 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
RM1 HG006193 / HG / NHGRI NIH HHS / United States